Launch Cables, Part 1 offers a historical perspective on the need and proper use of launch cables for OTDR testing. Part 2 (next month) will discuss specific testing situations.
No matter what you pruchase these days, manufacturers include product registration cards. Even inexpensive consumer products like Bluetooth head phones and toasters come with product registration cards. The volume of these we see with everyday purchases can drive one to a cynical viewpoint - All they want is to collect contact information for marketing purposes. This is undoubtedly true in some cases. However, test equipment is a different situation.
The majority of fiber system outages result from localized damage that only extends 3-5 meters on each side. To limit and reduce the downtime of a cut or damaged fiber optic system, having an emergency restoration kit (ERK) on hot standby is imperative.
All modern communications systems are based on fiber optic cable – hair-thin (or thinner) strands of glass that carry information by transmitting pulses of light, which are usually created by lasers.
The optical time domain reflectometer (OTDR) is now thirty-six years old and aging gracefully. While fiber optic cables had been installed in North America since 1977, one major concern was and still is: how do we accurately locate a fault? This is the major reason that OTDRs exist. Fortunately, as the communications industry has matured, so has the OTDR. Why use it?
One of the many reasons to use an OTDR for testing and troubleshooting is to get data about a severe bend or break in your cable plant. The OTDR can provide the location of a break so that you can send out a crew to repair it. But, how accurate is that location?
Our instructors answer a lot of questions. Here are a few of the most common ones.
Our instructors answer a lot of questions. Here are a few of the most common ones.
What do flossing your teeth, changing your car’s oil, and cleaning your fiber optic network connections have in common? We know how important it is to do these tasks — but often don’t follow through until something goes wrong!
Maximizing the efficiency of optical line terminal (OLT) cards in passive optical networks (PON) in low-density and rural FTTx installations can be a major challenge. In most PON designs, it is considered ideal to connect 32 subscribers to a single OLT for maximum cost efficiency.
The accepted best practice for testing link loss in a multimode network calls for the most accurate and repeatable test set up: the one-jumper reference method.
I frequently hear customers complain that although nothing has changed in their fiber optic cable assembly production process, the measured Insertion Loss (IL) and Return Loss (RL) values of their product aren’t as good as they once were. Is something wrong with the measurement equipment? Well, it’s possible but unlikely.
Today’s designers use splitters to passively tap, split, and multiplex optical signals. Since their introduction in the 1970s, splitters have seen their share of technological development, including the use of bulk optics, lenses, and optical fibers.
Attenuation is major concern in every fiber optic system. The further a digital signal travels, the more its strength diminishes. Every splice, every connector, and even the fiber itself will contribute a tiny bit more to the overall system loss. Fortunately, for spans that are too long or have losses that are too great, a solution exists in the form of optical amplifiers.
Fiber optic communication systems consist of more than just a physical fiber optic link and troubleshooting must always begin with an examination of the entire network. A technician must look at the big picture to rule out other potential trouble spots before suspecting the fiber or other passive optical components.
A few months ago, we published some information about the pros and cons of sealed versus weather-tight fiber optic splice closures (FOSCs). We recently came across some additional information on labor time when having to splice into each type in an aerial installation.
A high-performance fiber optic network requires low attenuation and low reflectance values to obtain the necessary bit error rate level. Unfortunately, all it takes is one contaminated or damaged connector to slow down or disrupt a transmission system.
Although fiber to the home (FTTH) is now considered mature, the industry is still bringing new evolutions of the technology to the forefront. It is critical that designers, planners, and managers know what these evolutions are and how to migrate from a legacy or next generation fiber to the user (FTTx) network.
The proper installation of cables and patch cords and the routing of optical fibers in splice trays is crucial to meet the performance expectations of today’s high-speed fiber optic systems. However, these proper practices can sometimes be forgotten with the emergence of bend insensitive or bend tolerant fibers.
Most installers and operators focus on optical attenuation and dispersion to handle increasing data rates. However, in single-mode systems, reflectance is just as critical to achieve the desired bit error rate (BER).